Skip to content
Bright Center UK

Will Different Countries Emulate Australia's Lead in Banning Social Media for Under-16s?

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing number of states are moving toward parallel bans.

  • The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
  • The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the AI".
  • The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures under consideration".
  • In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to pass a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
  • The government in The Netherlands has urged families to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, support built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and fit for minors," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the regional level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

  • The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
  • Florida has passed a measure banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
  • Virginia has approved a rule limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
  • The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills demanding adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some figures to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of the West, additional states are likewise taking action.

  • Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
  • Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies adopt a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.

CO
The writer

Crystal Owens

A seasoned business strategist with over 15 years of experience in corporate innovation and digital transformation.

Bright Center UK

Type to search articles.